- From: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:10:05 +0200
- To: Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>
- Cc: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, Alistair Miles <alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk>, SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
All,
In today's call [1]:
RESOLVED: drop the word 'concept' from
the labels 'has broader concept', 'has
narrower concept', 'has related concept', per
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Apr/0074.html
This leaves us with the labels below, with changes as noted, and
completes my action [2]. Sean will make the changes in the Rec
draft.
Tom
[1] http://www.w3.org/2009/04/21-swd-minutes.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/2009/04/21-swd-minutes.html#action01
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 04:36:15PM +0200, Thomas Baker wrote:
> Labels in http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-skos-reference-20090317/skos.rdf:
> Collection
> Concept Scheme
> Concept
> Ordered Collection
> alternative label
> change note
> definition
> editorial note
> example
> has broader concept
Change to: "has broader"
> has broader match
> has broader transitive
> has close match
> has exact match
> has member list
> has member
> has narrower concept
Change to: "has narrower"
> has narrower match
> has narrower transitive
> has related concept
Change to: "has related"
> has related match
> has top concept
> hidden label
> history note
> is in mapping relation with
> is in scheme
> is in semantic relation with
> is top concept in scheme
> notation
> note
> preferred label
> scope note
>
> Labels in http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-skos-reference-20090317/skos-xl.rdf:
> Label
> alternative label
> hidden label
> label relation
> literal form
> preferred label
--
Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
Received on Tuesday, 21 April 2009 16:10:46 UTC