Re: SKOS comments: conflict in broader/broaderTransitive and transitivity?

Antoine Isaac wrote:
> Dear Daniel,
> 
> Hopefully you will find an answer to our question in the last "Note on 
> supposed "transitiveness inheritance"" in the section of the SKOS Primer 
> on transitive hierarchies [1].

Yes.  Thanks.


> This topic was indeed raised quite many times, since that's a point of 
> RDFS sub-property link semantics which is far from trivial...

Yeah, I figured that subproperty relationships were tricker than
familar subclass relationships.


Daniel
-- 
(Plain text sometimes corrupted to HTML "courtesy" of Microsoft Exchange.) [F]