- From: Alistair Miles <alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:04:37 +0100
- To: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Cc: SWD Working Group <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Hi Tom, Just a couple of quick thoughts... On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 07:34:33PM +0200, Thomas Baker wrote:> Dear all, > > I'm looking at [1], also known as [2]. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-skos-reference-20090317/skos.html > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-skos-reference-20090317/skos > > This document calls itself "SKOS Simple Knowledge > Organization System RDF Schema". > > One obvious problem is that the document is clearly an HTML > page and not an RDF schema. It may seem obvious to us that it > is really _about_ the RDF schema, but I can well imagine this > causing some confusion. > > In the section of that document labeled "SKOS RDF Schema", then, > there is a link labeled "SKOS RDF Schema" which points to > > [3] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core > > which however -- since I am reading it in a browser -- > content-negotiates back to [1]! > > However, the section does provide an additional link directly > to the schema itself ("download the RDF schema without content > negotiation") [4]. > > [4] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core.rdf > > Given the title and introduction, then, the reader does not > necessarily expect to find the _contents_ of the RDF schema by > scrolling down one screen. > > I find this all delightfully confusing... :-) > > Some issues and suggestions for discussion: > > -- Maybe call the Web document [1-2] "Contents of the RDF > schema for Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS)" > or "Expressing SKOS in RDF" - in effect, anything but > "SKOS RDF schema" :-) What about "SKOS Namespace Document" ? > -- I'm wondering if this document [1-2] might be a good > place to introduce and link any DL versions of SKOS as per Sean's > discussion in [7]. The document could briefly explain the need > to have a DL ontology in some contexts, describe the algorithm > by which some of the axioms in [4] are "thrown away" (or filtered > out). In a way, the DL schema is arguably just another subset > of the semantic conditions described SKOS Reference, albeit a > deliberately lossy one. Grouping points to the RDF, HTML, and DL > excerpts together in one document would be helpful; and where else > to do that but in this document [1-2]? (This assumes we want to > publish, or indeed say anything at all about, a DL version - also an > issue for discussion.) I'd be happy for these links to go in the namespace document. Cheers, Alistair -- Alistair Miles Senior Computing Officer Image Bioinformatics Research Group Department of Zoology The Tinbergen Building University of Oxford South Parks Road Oxford OX1 3PS United Kingdom Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman Email: alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0)1865 281993
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 10:05:14 UTC