- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 15:43:59 +0100
- To: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Hi, Again two cents, quickly. We had a similar case once. We just did not represent them at the time, but if it had been a matter of life or death I would have used (specialization) of mapping properties, as Michael proposed. Another option is to used dc:subject (or a specialization of it) : after all indexing of concepts or classes by other concepts or classes can be likened to indexing of douments (or general resources) by concepts or classes! Antoine > ISSUE-182: Last Call Comment: Index Terms > > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/182 > > Raised by: Sean Bechhofer > On product: SKOS > > Raised by Michael Panzer [1]: > > > 2. Index terms > -------------- > > An important part of many classification systems is an index, in the > case of the DDC its "Relative Index". Index terms associated with a > given class generally reflect several of the topics falling within the > scope of that class. There is no easy way of modeling this relationship > in SKOS: > > Class/Concept: > 616 Diseases > > Index terms: > Clinical medicine > Diseases--humans--medicine > Illness--medicine > Internal medicine > Physical illness--medicine > Sickness--medicine > > Currently, a possible workaround is to construct the complete Relative > Index as a separate skos:ConceptScheme and relate the concepts in these > two independent schemes by using mapping relations: > > skosclass:hasIndexTerm rdfs:subPropertyOf skos:closeMatch . > > skosclass:isIndexTermOf rdfs:subPropertyOf skos:closeMatch ; > owl:inverseOf skosclass:hasIndexTerm . > > <class/616> a skos:Concept ; > skosclass:hasIndexTerm <index/Clinical%20medicine> ; > skos:inScheme <classification> . > > <index/Clinical%20medicine> a skos:Concept ; > skosclass:isIndexTermOf <class/616> ; > skos:inScheme <index> . > > This seems to be a satisfactory best-practice solution in this case, but > it has broader implications as index terms are just one instance of > Class-Topic Relations > > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Oct/0061.html > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2008 14:47:58 UTC