- From: Alistair Miles <alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 20:15:27 +0100
- To: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
- Cc: SWD Working SWD <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Looks good to me. On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 05:02:30PM +0100, Sean Bechhofer wrote: > > > Hi all, > > Here's a draft response to Michael on [ISSUE-136], let me know what you > think. Note *this is just a draft, not the actual response* -- I'll > wait for feedback from the WG before replying formally to > Michael. (Michael if you're lurking on this list feel free to post your > thoughts at any time.) > > Sean > > > Dear Michael > > Thank you for your comments [1]: > > """ > I'm not clear how to express S12 in OWL, should this be intended. One > can use > rdfs:Literal as the range, which would also contain all typed literals. > One can > use xsd:string, which has at least a value space equivalent to the set of > plain > literals, but this would require to have labels of the form "Hello > World!"^^xsd:string. > > Note: Currently, there is some ongoing work (by the OWL and the RIF > working > groups) on specifying a new data type "rdf:text", which denotes the set > of all > internationalized plain tags. But, AFAIU, this datatype will /not/ > contain those > plain literals having /no/ language tag. Here is some text, which is > currently > under development (so be careful, it's nothing official): > <http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/InternationalizedStringSpec>. > """ > > ------------------------------------------------------------- > > As you point out, there are some constraints in the SKOS data model that > we are unable to express in OWL (some of these /may/ be addressed by OWL > 2, but in the current SKOS specification we are avoiding reference to > work in progress). In such cases, the constraints are expressed in prose > in the document. Thus the lack of an OWL version of S12 is rather through > /necessity/ than intention. > > Statements to this effect are made in Section 1.7.1 of the LC draft. Do > you feel these are sufficient, or do we need to further elaborate this > point? > > As you point out, in this case it would be possible to approximate the > constraint -- this is a choice we have not made here. Are you willing to > live with the current status? > > [ISSUE-136] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/136 > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Sep/0044.html > > -- > Sean Bechhofer > School of Computer Science > University of Manchester > sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk > http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer > > > > -- Alistair Miles Senior Computing Officer Image Bioinformatics Research Group Department of Zoology The Tinbergen Building University of Oxford South Parks Road Oxford OX1 3PS United Kingdom Web: http://purl.org/net/aliman Email: alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk Tel: +44 (0)1865 281993
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2008 19:16:05 UTC