ISSUE-158 draft response

Hi all,

Here's a draft response to Peter on [ISSUE-158], let me know what you
think. Note *this is just a draft, not the actual response* -- I'll
wait for feedback from the WG before replying formally to
Peter. (Peter if you're lurking on this list feel free to post your
thoughts at any time.)


Dear Peter

Thank you for your comments [1]:

The introduction uses some sophisticated Turtle constructs without even
any mention of the syntax being used.  At least a pointer is required


The Turtle document is cited and referenced in Section 1.2. There are  
also brief explanations in Sections 1.7.3 and 9.5. However, this is a  
reasonable observation. Would moving these explanations into the  
introduction address your concerns?


	Sean Bechhofer
	Alistair Miles


Sean Bechhofer
School of Computer Science
University of Manchester

Received on Thursday, 2 October 2008 16:14:55 UTC