Re: [Recipes] proposed resolution for remaing issues

Dear all,

I've updated the status of these issues in the tracker as per
yesterday's resolution.

Best,

Diego.

El lun, 03-11-2008 a las 17:13 +0100, Diego Berrueta Munoz escribió:
> Jon and I would like to propose the following resolutions for the four
> remaining issues regarding Recipes:
> 
> * ISSUE-24 "Additional text explaining redirect choices in the 
> recipes" http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/24
> We propose to postpone the issue. We didn't address it when we
> released
> the document as a Note. From my point of view, the question on "why
> not
> MultiViews?" is an implementation detail that is Apache-specific. Our
> document tries to explain the generic mechanism instead.
> 
> * ISSUE-30 "Determine how and if RDDL relates to the Recipes"
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/30
> We propose to postpone the issue. We didn't address it when we
> released
> the document as a Note. At a first sight it seems that there may be 
> some connection, but I think that there are substantial differences. 
> Semantic web agents simply do not dereference XML namespaces (even if
> XML namespaces are used in RDF/XML documents). They dereference URIs
> that identify RDF resources (classes, properties, vocabularies...).
> 
> * ISSUE-60 "Guidelines needed for proper construction of vocabulary
> scheme and 'term' URIs" http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/60
> We propose to close this issue. I agree with the spirit of the
> issue: such guidelines are certainly something I would like to have, 
> but they are out of the scope of our document.
> 
> * ISSUE-98 "URI escaping in SPARQL query in Recipe 6"
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/98
> I propose to postpone the issue. Maybe we should have added a link to
> this issue in the Recipes, but we didn't. The problem is real,
> although
> it won't be noticed by most of our readers. I haven't tested the
> proposed solution in detail, and I vaguely remember Ralph raising some
> concern about it during a telecon many months ago. Implementing the
> solution "by default" in all the recipes would obfuscate them. I think
> postponing the issue is the best solution: we acknowledge the problem,
> we provide the solution, and we can include a pointer in a future
> revision of the Recipes.
> 
> We're happy to discuss these proposals. However, I'm afraid that I
> have
> to send regrets for tomorrow's telecon as I'll be travelling at that
> time.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> --
> Diego Berrueta
> R&D Department  -  CTIC Foundation
> E-mail: diego.berrueta@fundacionctic.org
> Phone: +34 984 29 12 12
> Parque Científico Tecnológico Gijón-Asturias-Spain
> www.fundacionctic.org
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2008 09:04:55 UTC