W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > May 2008

Re: Updated RDFa Syntax Editor's Draft

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 07:14:14 +0200
Message-ID: <481AA326.3090508@w3.org>
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
Cc: "public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf.w3.org" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org, public-swd-wg@w3.org


I only had a quick look at the processing step part (which was, I guess,
the most critical) but it looks o.k. to me. Removing that return flag
made it a bit simpler, in fact, as Mark predicted...

I noted that there are two more predefined @rel values. We should think
about updating the corresponding test case...

I am a little bit suprised (not having followed this discussion in
details, I am afraid, sorry about that) that we have now two SHOULD
things on conformance, namely @profile and @version. Isn't that an
overkill? Is there a subtle difference between the two and that is why
we need both? Maybe some explanatory text in the spec might be in order...


Shane McCarron wrote:
> As per my implied action item today, I have updated the Editor's Draft
> of RDFa Syntax.  The update, including diff marks from the previous
> editor's draft AND from the last call draft, is available at
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/ED-rdfa-syntax-20080501/
> Note that I do not believe this draft to be perfect.  There are likely
> broken links, validity problems etc.  It is just a snapshot reflecting
> all changes as a result of last call comments thus far.


Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Friday, 2 May 2008 05:14:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:31:51 UTC