- From: Reul, Q. H. <q.reul@abdn.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:11:50 -0000
- To: "SWD WG" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Hi, >From my point of view, I would rather use skos:hasNarrower rather than skos:hasNarrowerConcept and the same for broader properties and related one. The formal semantic of the properties should make it the domain and range of the property clear rather than its name. Contrary to Margherita [1], I believe that the documentation properties (i.e. skos:note, etc.) are self explanatory through their formal semantic. Regards, Quentin [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0150.html -----Original Message----- From: public-swd-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-swd-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of SWD Issue Tracker Sent: 22 January 2008 15:02 To: public-swd-wg@w3.org Subject: ISSUE-82: PropertyNames ISSUE-82: PropertyNames http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/82 Raised by: Antoine Isaac On product: SKOS >From http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0150.html or http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0075.html or http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jan/0089.html ======= For all relationships as already mentioned I suggest to make them more clear by adding the verb. For example: - skos:hasNarrowerConcept - skos:hasBroaderConcept - skos:hasRelatedConcept ======= The current SKOS specification uses the URI skos:broader, skos:narrower, skos:related. Should these be changed?
Received on Tuesday, 22 January 2008 15:12:05 UTC