Re: [SKOS] proposed resolution for Issue 4 - BroaderNarrowerSemantics

On 16 Jan 2008, at 01:21, Guus Schreiber wrote:

>
> Afterthought about naming:
>
> broaderTransitive => broaderAncestor
> narrowerTransitive => narrowerDescendant
> This assumes readers understand the intended difference (a la  
> XPath) between parent/ancestor and child/descendant.
>
> Of course, these names need also to be evaluated in terms of the  
> overall discussion about the broader/narrower names (I have to  
> think every time I use them; for me the current meaning in  
> counterintuitive).
>
> Guus
>
> PS I also suggest this naming discussion should not hold up  
> publication of new WD.
>

I propose that we simply pick some names and use these in the WD with  
a @@TODO to the effect that the names are provisional (but the  
pattern is not).

	Sean

--
Sean Bechhofer
School of Computer Science
University of Manchester
sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk
http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer

Received on Wednesday, 16 January 2008 09:24:37 UTC