- From: Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:59:47 -0500
- To: public-swd-wg@w3.org
ACTION: Ralph see if W3C Systems Team can help with question on Apache conditional redirects [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/08-swd-minutes.html#action17] I sent the following message yesterday and have received a quite detailed reply, which I will forward in my next message. ---- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:23:11 -0500 From: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org> Subject: advice solicited by SWD WG on apache conditional redirects In its document "Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies", (TR at [1], editor's draft at [2]) the Semantic Web Deployment Working Group is addressing the following challenges (among many): - Get people to use 303 redirects for RDF vocabularies - As much KISS as feasible - Show things that can be done by users of a hosting service; that is, with minimal involvement of the server administrators - Handle clients that wish HTML as well as clients that wish RDF The document shows specific configuration directives for apache but also intends that the patterns be clear enough to be translated for other servers by the community. The WG knows that the proper way to handle content negotiation in apache is via MultiViews and type maps [3]. However, this requires server sysadmin support and is something more than KISS. Also, MultiViews has a file naming restriction that has been considered too onerous [3,4]. Therefore, the WG has chosen to use conditional redirects to implement the 2x2 most common cases. At the face-to-face in October, the question was raised whether conditional redirects were "common" [4]. DanBri offered to ping some of his contacts in the Apache Foundation. He never did that and the WG is still wondering what other reactions "Those Who Know Apache Well" might have. Webmasters, etc. -- any comments you might have on the use of RewriteCond in general, or the use of RewriteCond specifically as the SWD WG proposes, would be appreciated. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-swbp-vocab-pub-20060314/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/recipes/draft-20071203 [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Feb/0076 [4] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/24 [5] http://www.w3.org/2007/10/09-swd-minutes.html#item04 Thanks, -Ralph
Received on Tuesday, 15 January 2008 15:01:34 UTC