RE: [SKOS] ISSUE-32 ConceptSchemeLabellingInteractions

The appropriate relation between those terms would be  
"EnglishEquivalent" or some such, not "preferredLabel".
Daniel

Quoting "Sini, Margherita (KCEW)" <Margherita.Sini@fao.org>:

>
> I can give an example in French:
>
> politique (FR)  = politics (EN)
>       and
> politique (FR)  = policies (EN)
>
> But I also know that we have maybe to change one of the two French terms...
>
> And
>
> Colourants (ES)  = Colourants (EN)    ---- BT Chemical substances
>       and
> Colourants (ES)  = Dyes (EN)    ---- BT  Colourants
>
> (but maybe in the second case the spanish should be Tintes?)
>
> Regards
> Margherita
>
>
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: public-swd-wg-request@w3.org on behalf of Daniel Rubin
>  Sent: Fri 08/02/2008 13:38
>  To: Antoine Isaac; SWD WG
>  Cc:
>  Subject: Re: [SKOS] ISSUE-32 ConceptSchemeLabellingInteractions
>
>
>
>
>  At 12:44 AM 2/8/2008, Antoine Isaac wrote:
>
>  >Dear all,
>  >
>  >Alistair had some concern about the wording of the attached
>  >proposal, which we accepted in last week's.
>  >>
>  >>Dear all,
>  >>
>  >>Regarding ISSUE-32 ConceptSchemeLabellingInteractions [1], I
>  >>propose that we accept the following recommendation from the SKOS
>  >>Primer [2, section 2.1.1]
>  >>
>  >>>Following common practice in KOS design, the preferred label of a
>  >>>concept may be also used to unambiguously represent this concept
>  >>>within one KOS and its applications. Although SKOS semantics do
>  >>>not formally enforce it, it is therefore recommended that no two
>  >>>concepts in the same KOS be given the same preferred lexical label
>  >>>in any given language.
>  >
>  >To alleviate these concerns, the Primer should now read
>  >[[
>  >Following common practice in KOS design, the preferred label of a
>  >concept may be also used to unambiguously represent this concept
>  >within one KOS and its applications. It is therefore recommended
>  >that no two concepts in the same KOS be given the same preferred
>  >lexical label in any given language. But SKOS semantics do not
>  >formally enforce this, since some commonly used classification
>  >schemes, for instance, may break this rule.
>
>  Can you give example of a classification scheme that breaks this
>  rule? It doesn't make much sense for the preferred label of a concept
>  NOT to unambiguously represent the concept within ONE KOS.
>
>  >]]
>  >
>  >Alistair, are you ok with this?
>  >
>  >Cheers,
>  >
>  >Antoine
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/32
>  >>[2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/SKOS/DraftPrimer , January
>  >>24 editor's draft.
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>
>  >
>  >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 8 February 2008 13:05:59 UTC