- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:53:43 +0100
- To: Sean Bechhofer <sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk>
- CC: SWD Working Group <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Hi Sean, >> >> ACTION: Sean to add rdf:type and rdf:Property assertions to the skos >> schema [recorded in >> http://www.w3.org/2008/11/18-swd-minutes.html#action07] >> >> -- http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/153 SKOS namespace >> change question - I >> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/175 SKOS namespace >> change question - II >> 2008-11-25. Sean drafting a proposed resolution to keep old namespace? > > There are some draft words in an appendix to: > > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/SKOS/reference/20081001/ I like it very much -- especially the conciseness. One point: I guess skos:example is still in (or I hope so, as we're using it for lcsh.info ;-) Reading the proposed annex, I was also wondering about saying something about the old SKOS Extensions and SKOS Mapping vocabularies [1], as these were closely related to the 2005 vocabulary, namespace-wise. But I guess that since these are marked as globally deprecated, and we don't mess with their namespace, we could just safely ignore them... Cheers, Antoine [1] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/vocabs > > -- > Sean Bechhofer > School of Computer Science > University of Manchester > sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk > http://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/people/bechhofer > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2008 12:54:22 UTC