- From: Daniel Rubin <rubin@med.stanford.edu>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:39:07 -0700
- To: "Alistair Miles" <alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk>, "'SWD Working SWD'" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
I think it would be useful to have a SKOS schema in OWL DL. One approach might be to factor the OWL-Full representation into an OWL-DL component and an OWL-Full component (Natasha Noy and I recently did this in producing an OWL version of FMA [1]). Daniel [1] http://stanford.edu/~rubin/pubs/WEBSEM127.pdf At 06:14 AM 4/29/2008, Alistair Miles wrote: > > 2/ The schema defines an OWL ontology. There are some explanatory > > remarks concerning this. > >Note in particular that this schema is *not* an OWL DL ontology. It's OWL >Full mainly because of the use of some SKOS documentation properties and DC >Terms properties to annotate the SKOS classes and properties themselves. >There may also be an issue with RDF list. It *may* be possible to make the >SKOS schema an OWL DL ontology without contradicting the SKOS reference, so >if this is important to you, speak now.
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2008 14:39:52 UTC