- From: Sini, Margherita (KCEW) <Margherita.Sini@fao.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 09:30:39 +0200
- To: public-swd-wg@w3.org
Hi all, The minutes [1] from yesterday's telecon are now online for review. A text copy follows. [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/04/01-swd-minutes.html ------------------------------------------------------- SWD WG 01 Apr 2008 Agenda <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Mar/0093.html> [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Mar/0093.html] See also: IRC log <http://www.w3.org/2008/04/01-swd-irc> [http://www.w3.org/2008/04/01-swd-irc] Attendees Present Ralph, Marghe, Tom_Baker, qreul, Alistair, EdSu, DLRubin, JonP, Antoine_Isaac, Guus, berrueta, Ben_Adida, Elisa_Kendall Regrets Sean, Vit, Simone Chair Tom Baker Scribe Margherita Sini Contents * Topics <http://www.w3.org/2008/04/01-swd-minutes.html#agenda> 1. ADMIN <http://www.w3.org/2008/04/01-swd-minutes.html#item01> 2. SKOS primer <http://www.w3.org/2008/04/01-swd-minutes.html#item02> 3. SKOS Reference <http://www.w3.org/2008/04/01-swd-minutes.html#item03> 4. Relationships between labels <http://www.w3.org/2008/04/01-swd-minutes.html#item04> 5. "Open" SKOS Issues <http://www.w3.org/2008/04/01-swd-minutes.html#item05> 6. RDFa <http://www.w3.org/2008/04/01-swd-minutes.html#item06> 7. RECIPES <http://www.w3.org/2008/04/01-swd-minutes.html#item07> 8. F2F Meeting <http://www.w3.org/2008/04/01-swd-minutes.html#item09> 9. VOCABULARY MANAGEMENT <http://www.w3.org/2008/04/01-swd-minutes.html#item10> * Summary of Action Items <http://www.w3.org/2008/04/01-swd-minutes.html#ActionSummary> _____ <scribe> Scribe: Margherita Sini <scribe> Scribenick: marghe Previous: http://www.w3.org/2008/03/18-swd-minutes.html ADMIN Tom: Summertime started --> back to usual time ... March 18 conference: propose to accept no objections RESOLUTION: Minutes from March 18 accepted. <scribe> ACTION: Chairs to draft charter extension proposal for SKOS until July 1st [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/26-swd-minutes.html#action01] [CONTINUES] Tom: Face-to-face meeting ... looks is Washington a good choice except for Alistar ... so maybe better in Europe? ... we come back to that later SKOS primer <scribe> ACTION: Alistair and Guus to check the text in the primer on relationship between Concept Schemes and OWL Ontologies. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/29-swd-minutes.html#action13] [CONTINUES] <scribe> ACTION: Guus to write primer text re: broaderGeneric and equivalence w/r/t subclass [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/18-swd-minutes.html#action08] [CONTINUES] SKOS Reference Tom: raised issues regarding NL definition ... if SKOS no use NL --> join 2005 definition? Alistar: on one hand having short definition is good for translation ... however no in the current skos because need revision (?) ... maybe we can add 2005 definition ... wonder if we can put the NL definition as comments? Tom: possible to move NL def to primer? Alistar: same challenge... Antoine: will be the same problem ... if we agree we can use old definitions <edsu> david booth's email -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Mar/0047.html Tom: i prefere to have definitions so seems an editorial / technical issue ... short definitions like owl has no per-term definitions. Can we have an agreement ? <aliman> I think tom said owl has *no* per-term definitions <Guus> sorry, seem to be muted <Guus> one sec ??: in favour of description of short paragraph with one example scribe: including definition Alistar: in addition to the text of the reference will have a RDFS comment / URI <TomB> Guus: we threw out the "comments" in OWL <TomB> ...would be in favor of putting short descriptions into an appendix <TomB> Alistair: rdfs:comment is an annotation property in OWL <TomB> Alistair: agrees with Guus that schema is for a machine so doesn't really need comments <TomB> Alistair: Guus says we can have links to fragment identifiers Tom: are we in agreement? or should we have an issue? <Guus> yes, link to frag id of the definition short text is necessary but point is where to put it? Alistar: I support multilinguality possiblities <scribe> ACTION: Sean to propose a way to handle deprecated properties [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/01-swd-minutes.html#action04] <scribe> ACTION: Ralph to check whether the common interpretation of rdfs isDefinedBy fits the reasoning that was made in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Oct/0141.html [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/01-swd-minutes.html#action05] Relationships between labels <scribe> ACTION: Antoine will review Alistair's proposals w/r/t the relationship between the existing solution and the extension [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/18-swd-minutes.html#action06] "Open" SKOS Issues <scribe> ACTION: Alistair to make a proposal for Issue 40 [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/01-swd-minutes.html#action06] <scribe> ACTION: Alistair to review Antoine and Guus' emails to move ISSUE-71 and -74 [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/18-swd-minutes.html#action09] Alistar: due to multiple dimension ... <edsu> Graham Klyne's comments -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Mar/0092.html <Ralph> Comment on OWL formalism used in SKOS core <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Mar/0092.html> [Graham Klyne 2008-03-31] RDFa <scribe> ACTION: Ben to prepare draft implementation report for RDFa [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/01-swd-minutes.html#action07] Ben: implementation report easy to put it together ... primer is going to be put together, revised approach--> keep it simple, draft in the wiki ... got a review from yahoo ... got good comments, no significant change RECIPES <edsu> benadida, have you seen the recent tag minutes re: CURIE? <scribe> ACTION: Diego, Jon and Ralph to coordinate Recipes examples for w3c site [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/11-swd-minutes.html#action09] [DONE] Diego?: will be good have a uri containing the date? to have examples consistent with the document <JonP> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/recipes/examples/ agreed in principle Diego: changes will effect this files <scribe> ACTION: Ralph propose resolution to ISSUE-16 "Default behavior" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14] [CONTINUES] <scribe> ACTION: Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of Recipes implementations] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action20] [CONTINUES] <scribe> ACTION: Recipes editors to clarify and write some sentences for the title that spells out points Ed made for .htaccess and Apache [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/18-swd-minutes.html#action13] [CONTINUES] Jon?: plan a new editor draft release today scribe: should we wait we solve other issues first? Diego: prefer wait a week, to fix typos, etc. F2F Meeting <Ralph> May F2F poll results <http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/39408/FTF-May-2008-poll/results> <Guus> availability of key editors <Guus> ? Tom: problem of a US f-2-f meeting is Alistar participation <Guus> alistair, antoine, ed, sean Tom: but can join remotely <Guus> alistair has to be there, I think, in person <Ralph> Ralph: yes, having Alistair in person seems critical to me Alistair: Sean cannot make that week Alistar: telecon may be one option <Guus> if sean cannot make it, alistair has to be there in person Tom: EU option for 6-7 are reasonable, but 7-8 only few people can be there <Guus> I propose Tue-Wed 6-7 in A'dam Tom: Amsterdam Tuesd + wed seems better than 7-8 Alistar: will look for US feasibility <Guus> let's decide 6-7, venue either Adam or Wash <Guus> we should fix at least the date Clay and Jon cannot do Amsterdam (?) decision: 6-7 Amsterdam ? <Guus> first pref Washinton, 2nd pref A'dam Tom: either Amst or Wash on 6-7 <Guus> [alistair: US is very cheap now :-)] Jon, Ralph and Clay no in Amsterdam --> pref. remote or in person Alistar in Wash <Guus> Propose to fix date 6-7 <Guus> agre with Tom RESOLUTION: F-2-F meeting dates will be 6-7 VOCABULARY MANAGEMENT Tom: last week 2 reviewers (Diego and Marc) <Guus> [i'm calling Mark now] Ton: we need Marc review as well ... in terms of process will be good to have signs at f-2-f meeting <edsu> aliman: not sure if it'll make any difference but BWI is a possible destination airport for DC area Elisa: can go in W'ton 6-7 ... hard if Am'dam <Guus> mark has agreed Elisa: can do remotely in Am'dam <Guus> hopefully in a week; t most 2 weeks RESOLUTION: Mark will do the review <Guus> [sry, have to go] Elisa: situation is good <Ralph> ACTION: Guus to ask Mark van Assem to review VM Editor's Draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/18-swd-minutes.html#action17] [DONE] <TomB> [thanks Guus] Elisa: will appreciate attention to v1.1 ... is time for other people to have a look Tom: meeting adjourned. <Ralph> Elisa: for those who care about OWL Full -- and I think this WG does -- it's time to look more closely at the OWL WG Summary of Action Items [PENDING] ACTION: Alistair and Guus to check the text in the primer on relationship between Concept Schemes and OWL Ontologies. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/29-swd-minutes.html#action13] [PENDING] ACTION: Alistair to make a proposal for Issue 40 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/01-swd-minutes.html#action06] [PENDING] ACTION: Antoine will review Alistair's proposals w/r/t the relationship between the existing solution and the extension [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/18-swd-minutes.html#action06] [PENDING] ACTION: Alistair to review Antoine and Guus' emails to move ISSUE-71 and -74 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/18-swd-minutes.html#action09] [PENDING] ACTION: Ben to prepare draft implementation report for RDFa [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/01-swd-minutes.html#action07] [PENDING] ACTION: Chairs to draft charter extension proposal for SKOS until July 1st [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/26-swd-minutes.html#action01] [PENDING] ACTION: Guus to write primer text re: broaderGeneric and equivalence w/r/t subclass [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/18-swd-minutes.html#action08] [PENDING] ACTION: Ralph propose resolution to ISSUE-16 "Default behavior" [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action14] [PENDING] ACTION: Ralph to check whether the common interpretation of rdfs isDefinedBy fits the reasoning that was made in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Oct/0141.html [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/01-swd-minutes.html#action05] [PENDING] ACTION: Ralph/Diego to work on Wordnet implementation [of Recipes implementations] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/22-swd-minutes.html#action20] [PENDING] ACTION: Recipes editors to clarify and write some sentences for the title that spells out points Ed made for .htaccess and Apache [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/18-swd-minutes.html#action13] [PENDING] ACTION: Sean to propose a way to handle deprecated properties [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/04/01-swd-minutes.html#action04] [DONE] ACTION: Diego, Jon and Ralph to coordinate Recipes examples for w3c site [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/11-swd-minutes.html#action09] [DONE] ACTION: Guus to ask Mark van Assem to review VM Editor's Draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/18-swd-minutes.html#action17] [End of minutes]
Received on Wednesday, 2 April 2008 07:31:22 UTC