- From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:59:15 +0100
- To: SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
> ACTION: Guus to post an interpretation of the Amsterdam > discussion of isDefinedBy I think the following excerpts from the the day 2 minutes [1] capture the interpretation ell: <scribe_> al: the rdfs spec says "isDefinedBy may be used to indicate an rdf vocab in which a resource is described" [..] <Ralph> (that is, I'm pretty sure that no W3C spec says rdfs:isDefinedBy is an owl:FunctionalProperty but I think that this would be consistent with intent] [..] ... proposal is to accept the proposal from alistair as a resolution for closing issue 36 ... with two remarks 1. for historical reasons, inscheme is kept as a subprop of isDefinedBy 2. we dont touch hasTopConcept <Ralph> skos:inScheme al: are we explicitly depracating skos:inScheme Guus [1] -- VU University Amsterdam, Computer Science De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands T: +31 20 598 7739/7718; F: +31 84 712 1446 Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/
Received on Tuesday, 30 October 2007 14:59:39 UTC