- From: Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 12:03:34 -0400
- To: Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>
- Cc: public-swd-wg@w3.org
At 03:04 PM 3/22/2007 +0100, Thomas Baker wrote: >On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 10:32:03AM -0400, Ralph Swick wrote: ... >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/IssuesProcess ... >This is great. Thanks for reviewing it, Tom. >... I suggest: > >-- On [2], put the "Products" section first, maybe calling > it "SWD issues lists" so that users > coming directly to this page will immediately see what the page > is about. Yes, that would be more convenient. RIF did a customization to change the name of the 'Products' category (RIF calls it 'Topics'). I generalized the implementation of that customization but haven't yet incorporated it into the SWD tracker branch. I will do that. >-- Add a link to the Tracker page [2] pointing back to IssuesProcess > [1] for an explanation of process categories. I'll think about a generalized way to accommodate this. The tracker code is (supposed to be) common code shared by all WGs. >I have added a sentence or at the beginning of [1] explaining >what Tracker is and linking to the Tracker Web page [4]. Fine. (my personal style is to give about 50% of what you wrote and expect that people would follow the link to learn more, but you did the work so I'm happy :) BTW, the term 'slacker tracker' has another application that's under development so it might eventually be confusing to repeat it here, despite it's being used in the tracker docs.) >[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/IssuesProcess >[2] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/ >[3] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/Deliverables >[4] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/IssuesProcess?action=diff&rev2=12&rev1=11 > >-- >Tom Baker - tbaker@tbaker.de - baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2007 16:04:32 UTC