- From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetilk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 13:36:07 +0100
- To: public-swd-wg@w3.org
- Cc: Daniel Rubin <dlrubin@stanford.edu>
On Saturday 10 March 2007 13:11, Daniel Rubin wrote: > Thanks for announcing this. I think this is an excellent use case for > SKOS. ' Thanks! :-) > One question I have for you is how are you currently > implemented the functionality of people mapping their tags to a term > in Wordnet? For the time being, I only do a simple match to see what wordnet terms begins with the same letters as the tag. > For example, if they their tag is "canine" how do you > enable them to find "dog"? It would have to be in a future application of these data, I don't have a milestone for that now, but it is the idea that it should be done. > I didn't notice that why browsing the > links below. Also, how do you store a wordnet tag such that it refers > back to wordnet, and would things change much if using SKOS? Currently, I store URIs in a MySQL database, both the object URI, e.g. http://www.w3.org/2006/03/wn/wn20/instances/wordsense-dinner-noun-2 and a predicate URI. Currently, the default predicate URI is http://rdfs.org/sioc/ns#topic as I have plans to support SIOC. What kind of information resource there is at the wordnet URI doesn't currently influence my application, so if there would be a SKOS resource there at some point in the future, it would be all good. If a different URI is used to point to a SKOS formulation of a Wordnet, then I would have to evaluate how the URIs are being used. Right now, the URIs are not even exposed, so if I don't get around to do anything with them, that's easy enough. I would be interested in what comes out of the Wordnet RDF/OWL/SKOS work. BTW, I just found that our users have mapped 466 tags to Wordnet terms. That's pretty good, I would say! :-) Kjetil -- Kjetil Kjernsmo Semantic Web Specialist Opera Software ASA
Received on Monday, 12 March 2007 12:37:26 UTC