Re: [SKOS] ACTION on relating skos:Concept to a foaf:Person

Thank you, Tom!

I'd just like to point out that the most urgent part of this issue is 
not so much FOAF, but POWDER, that I posted in April:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Apr/0015.html

For reference for the POWDER group, here's the status update:
On Tuesday 19 June 2007 20:03, Thomas Baker wrote:
> We had an unscheduled discussion in today's telecon about the
> problem of linking skos:Concepts to classes in an ontology
> [1].  As explained by Kjetil Kjernsmo in January, the question
> is how to link a skos:Concept to, say, a foaf:Person [2].
> Properties called skos:is and skos:as were evidently considered
> at one point (definitions?).
>
> Alistair confirmed that he sees this requirement surfacing
> in various contexts, and Antoine sees the issue as related
> to the broader issue of OWL/SKOS coexistence [3].
>
> We agreed to put this on next week's agenda by posting
> these links to the list.  Antoine agreed to do this but the
> action was not recorded, so the unrecorded action can now be
> considered done :-)
>
> Tom
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/06/19-swd-irc#T15-53-18
> [2]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jan/0069.html
> [3]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jun/0077.html

-- 
Kjetil Kjernsmo
Semantic Web Specialist
Opera Software ASA

Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2007 08:03:39 UTC