- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:09:29 +0100
- To: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>
- Cc: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, "SWD WG" <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Hi Ben, I don't have a problem with not supporting this feature now, but there is no need to rule it out for the future. The aim of the feature is not to provide a shorthand, but to provide rules for parsing something that may already exist in some given language. (The idea of 're-use' does not need to be solely about inline mark-up, but can also be regarded as giving semantic meaning to _any_ already existing mark-up.) Obviously at the moment there is nothing like this in HTML/XHTML, so we don't really need it, but when you start importing things from other namespaces, it is a very useful feature. For example, if you created an HTML/XHTML profile that used the P3P attribute, you would want to make something meaningful from @p3p11:p3p. Regards, Mark On 19/06/07, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I have a "list of easily resolvable issues." We want to resolve these > ASAP, using email preferably. In other words, please respond ASAP with > your opinion on this. I encourage you all to consider that we need to > not change or complicate the XHTML1.1+RDFa specification too much anymore. > > This email concerns ISSUE-2. A separate followup email will be sent for > each remaining issue. Since ISSUE-2 is not very well documented in the > tracker, I'll summarize it here: > > there was a proposal to allow for attribute shorthands for certain > hidden triples, e.g: > > <div about="/foo/bar" dc:title="Foo Bar"> > ... > </div> > > which would yield > > </foo/bar> dc:title "Foo Bar" > > Mark, jump in if I've described this incorrectly. > > I propose that we *not* implement such a feature in XHTML1.1+RDFa. My > main argument is for simplicity and not having two ways of doing the > same thing. > > (I'm even tempted to say that XHTML2+RDFa shouldn't have it, either, > given that it starts to break away from the whole point of reusing > rendered data as structure. But that discussion doesn't need to happen > today.) > > What do you think? > > -Ben > > > -- Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer mark.birbeck@x-port.net | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com standards. innovation.
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 15:09:35 UTC