- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 09:34:02 -0500
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- CC: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Regardless of the other issues surrounding media types... I do not believe having RDFa enabled in a host language should effect its media type. Ben Adida wrote: > Issue #29: > http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/29 > > What should the MIME type of an RDFa document be? Proposal: whatever the > MIME type of the host document is. In the case of XHTML1.1+RDFa, > application/xhtml+xml. If/when RDFa becomes a valid extension for other > versions of HTML, then it will take on whatever MIME type they accept. > > Thoughts? Questions? Please answer, no matter what you think :) > > -Ben > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 14:34:14 UTC