W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swd-wg@w3.org > June 2007

Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-29: mime type of RDFa document

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:34:08 +0200
Message-ID: <4677CD40.6030406@danbri.org>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
CC: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>

Ivan Herman wrote:
> Dan,
> not pushing aside your question (for which I do not have a clear answer
> at the moment, I must admit), can you explain how this issue influences
> the original ISSUE-29?

Sure. Mime types define semantics of #blah. There are established, but 
different, precedents for the existing RDF and XHTML mimetypes. I wanted 
to make sure that if the XHTML mime type route is taken, there is no 
unexpected impact on #blah usage for non-document resources.

Does that make sense?

Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2007 12:34:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:31:43 UTC