- From: Thomas Baker <baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 07:57:13 +0200
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: SWD Working Group <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Antoine, In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2007Jun/0009.html: > >>Here is the full set of IDs (below). ... > >>http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-skos-ucr-20070516/#R-ConceptualRelations > >>http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-skos-ucr-20070516/#R-ConceptSchemeExtension You wrote: > About the action: > > >ACTION: Alistair to fix wording on skos issues sandbox [recorded in > >http://www.w3.org/2007/06/05-swd-minutes.html#action03] > I propose the following strategy: > > 1. When there is an existing requirement corresponding to the issue, we > follow the label which was given in the Use case document [1] I suggest we put a full set of URIs for Requirements onto one of the relevant wiki pages and make sure the other SKOS pages all point to it. That way, we can also all get into the habit of citing them in mailing-list postings. Tom -- Tom Baker - tbaker@tbaker.de - baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 05:57:20 UTC