Re: [SKOS] Last comments on UC description format

Hello all,

I have put on the wiki a filled questionnaire for the current UC format:
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/ManuscriptsCase

FYI, it took me something like 2 hours to complete (it is hard to 
evaluate, I had to do other things in the meantime): about 30 minutes 
for application, 1h30 for vocabularies. But notice that there are 2 
vocabularies, and one of them is not the simplest one can find...

Antoine

>
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed in this week's teleconference, the format for describing 
> use cases should be decided (and sent around) at the beginning of next 
> week. It would be great if *by monday (2006-12-01)* we have all the 
> comments of the participants who object to the current proposal 
> (building on Alistair's proposal), as available at [1]
>
> Amongst the concerns I have in mind, a first one is about the 
> *ordering of the different sections, and the position of questions 
> concerning mappings (cf. e.g. end of [2])*. I have tried in the 
> snapshot to solve that by actually keeping it independant, but 
> mentioned in both Application and Vocabularies sections, in order to 
> help contributors figure out why they should fill this section. Please 
> object if the overall chaining of sections/subsections sounds too fuzzy.
>
> A second, perhaps much more important one, is the *size and complexity 
> of the questionnaire*. Some have argued (e.g. [3]) that too complex a 
> form would deter people for contributing, while others think that on 
> the contrary a complete form helps contributors, as well as editors of 
> course. Please say so if you believe the current proposal is not 
> well-balanced at all!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Antoine
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/UCFormat
>
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Nov/0061.html
>
> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Nov/0047.html
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 30 November 2006 16:31:03 UTC