[SKOS] Last comments on UC description format

Hi all,

As discussed in this week's teleconference, the format for describing 
use cases should be decided (and sent around) at the beginning of next 
week. It would be great if *by monday (2006-12-01)* we have all the 
comments of the participants who object to the current proposal 
(building on Alistair's proposal), as available at [1]

Amongst the concerns I have in mind, a first one is about the *ordering 
of the different sections, and the position of questions concerning 
mappings (cf. e.g. end of [2])*. I have tried in the snapshot to solve 
that by actually keeping it independant, but mentioned in both 
Application and Vocabularies sections, in order to help contributors 
figure out why they should fill this section. Please object if the 
overall chaining of sections/subsections sounds too fuzzy.

A second, perhaps much more important one, is the *size and complexity 
of the questionnaire*. Some have argued (e.g. [3]) that too complex a 
form would deter people for contributing, while others think that on the 
contrary a complete form helps contributors, as well as editors of 
course. Please say so if you believe the current proposal is not 
well-balanced at all!

Cheers,

Antoine

[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/UCFormat

[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Nov/0061.html

[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2006Nov/0047.html

Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2006 22:22:30 UTC