- From: <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 01:59:27 +0200
- To: cawelty@frontiernet.net
- Cc: swbp <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>, public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org
> At our next telecon, we will spend our time on two main items: the next > UCR draft and the extensible design. > > For UCR, we will discuss issues 3, 4, 5, 7, 13, all of which have > outstanding actions that hopefully will be complete by the telecon. > We will propose to close issues 9&10 > Issue 6 seems to have been passed over (I don't recall discussion of > it), so we will talk about it. > We will discuss the definition of covers. > Most importantly, we will work on connecting the existing requirements > to the use cases (see > [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2006Sep/0005.html] > > > For the design, Harold has incorporated Peter's proposal with > modifications discussed at the last telecon here: > [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/A.1_Basis%3A_Positive_Conditions] > We will discuss this and the path forward to the full core language. I will not be at that tcon (am on holiday) but I wanted to repeat my remark that too me the condition language can be like a SPARQL WHERE clause without the GRAPH, OPTIONAL and FILTER features [1]. Maybe we can add to that the @forSome and @forAll productions and functional terms can simply be (fn x1 ... xi). -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/
Received on Saturday, 9 September 2006 23:59:45 UTC