Re: [WNET] new data and schema files

Mark, I see several new .rdf files in wn20/rdf/ that have old
versions in wn20/rdf/full/ -- namely:

wordnet-antonym.rdf
wordnet-derivationallyrelated.rdf
wordnet-participle.rdf (vs. full/participleof.rdf)
wordnet-pertainsto.rdf
wordnet-seealso.rdf

Were these just errors in your file names?  In each case the
editor's draft [1] (22 May revision) still refers to those files
as living in wn20/rdf/full/.

Also, should the new wordnet-attributeof.rdf replace the old
wordnet-attribute.rdf ? [1] cites "wordnet-attribute" (the old name).

And does the new wordnet-hypernym.rdf replace wordnet-hyponym.rdf?
[1] cites "wordnet-hyponym".

(I see that the new file declares both hypernyms and hyponyms
while the old one only declared hyponyms.)

And while I'm at it, I see these other mismatches between [1] and
the actual file names:

actual			cited in [1]

wordnet-synset		wordnet-synsets
wordnet-senselabels	wordnet-senselabel	(in basic/)

and there's a typo in the Basic senseLabels link; the draft
currently links to full/ whereas it clearly means to have been basic/.

However, I wonder if the senseLabel statements should be
included in the CBDs for Full as well?  (I did not include them
on my first pass).  One interpretation of [1] is that Full contains
all of the files listed, including senseLabels.

And schemas/wnbasic.rdfs does not actually declare the
senseLabel property, despite the text in its comments.

(I don't actually think it makes sense to have two schema files,
but I'm not going to suggest that we change that for this draft --
let's get some practical experience with the data first.)

I do think that senseLabel should be added somewhere in Figure 2.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wn-conversion.html#basicfull
    $Id: wn-conversion-20062304.html,v 1.8 2006/05/22 15:24:01 mvanasse Exp $

Received on Tuesday, 23 May 2006 19:04:56 UTC