- From: Libby Miller <libby@asemantics.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 06:59:22 -0800 (PST)
- To: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>
- cc: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>, SW Best Practices <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
regrets for me - I'm in a dawg call. Libby On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Ralph R. Swick wrote: > > At 03:23 PM 1/31/2006 +0100, Thomas Baker wrote: > > >SWBPD VM 2006-01-31 telecon agenda > ... > >-- Alistair cannot attend the call today. > > I'm at risk. I'm in an all-day meeting and hope to be able to duck > out of that for a telecon, but the agenda for the other meeting is fluid. > > > Alistair suggests removing both of the content types as > > conditions from the rewrite rules. Does the TF agree? > > yes, but since last telecon I've been implementing some of > the cookbook and found that I really want to support the > qs attributes in content negotiation. I have a few questions > for Alistair that I'd hoped to talk about today. I guess I'll put > my questions in mail after thinking about them more. > > > to get wget to change the default Accept headers. Does anyone > > know of an alternative command line HTTP client for use in a > > shell script? > > I've been using GET, ala > > GET -eUSH 'Accept: application/rdf+xml' ... > > which is one of the options of lwp-request [1]. > > [1] http://search.cpan.org/~gaas/libwww-perl-5.69/bin/lwp-request > > >-- We are up-to-date on all actions except: > > > > ACTION: Ralph to test recipes with W3C configuration. > > still in progress. > > >
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2006 14:59:34 UTC