- From: Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:22:45 -0500
- To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Cc: <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>, <dbooth@hp.com>
At 05:46 PM 1/10/2006 +0000, Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote: >Responding to point E1 [1] - how could we make the URIs shorter, given that they should actually work as described and therefore need a supporting server appropriately configured? I'd rather leave them as is at least for the first WD publication, because the isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk server is already configured to support them. I promised a while ago to test these configurations with the W3C site configuration. i haven't yet done so but do still hope to do this. So I propose that we keep the URIs as they are for the first public WD and change them to be in the w3c URI space for the next version. I think David was perhaps hoping we could shorten /VM/http-examples/exampleN also; for w3.org we'd likely have /2006/01/example/1 or something similar, which is a bit shorter but perhaps even less "readable".
Received on Tuesday, 17 January 2006 02:23:35 UTC