- From: Alvaro Graves <agraves@dcc.uchile.cl>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:40:41 -0300
- To: Mark van Assem <mark@cs.vu.nl>
- CC: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Dear Mark, Sorry for the huge delay, it seems my spam filter thought your email was suspicious :-) Anyways, the hash/slash subject was resolved in the following way: We decided to use a # before the word, because I thought it would be natural to group the words, synsets and wordsenses in different files, differentiating the base URI from the specific entity (word, synset) I want to reach. Also, for human readability, if I know that the word "computer" can be found http://wordnet.princeton.edu/~agraves/wordnet/0.9/words#computer it is natural to suppose the word "computational" can be found http://wordnet.princeton.edu/~agraves/wordnet/0.9/words#computational Finally I have added a JDBM version of the representation, you can check my web page at http://wordnet.princeton.edu/~agraves/ Mark van Assem wrote: > > Dear Alvaro, > > I had a quick look at the schema of your version and it seems it is > very similar to ours in its basic model (Words, WordSenses, Synsets, > all relations), we have been doing much of the same work in parallel :-( > > There are some differences such as that we have defined OWL > restrictions on the classes. I am curious how you have resolved some > of the issues listed in [1], e.g. how you have decided to generate > URIs for words, wordsenses and synsets, and the hash/slash issue, see > the recent discussions on (the archives of) this list. See [2] for our > current schema and data. > > We will include references to your work and comparison to ours in the > next version of our Draft Note. > > Thanks for informing us and do keep in touch, > Mark. > > [1]http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/wn-conversion.html > [2]http://www.cs.vu.nl/~mark/wn/ > > > Alvaro Graves wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> My name is Alvaro Graves, I am a MSc student in the University of >> Chile. Recently I have talked with Mark van Assem about our >> representation[1] of WordNet in RDF. I think that maybe you could be >> interested in using it as a more official one. That is, we think that >> you could use it as the WordNet TF version. We don't know if you have >> developed one, but I haven't seen one in your page, so I think we can >> contribute with our work to the WordNet TF. We have fixed some minor >> bugs over these months and I haven't received more reports. Also, it >> has been used by people, and seems it has been useful for them. I >> think it is necessary to change the namespaces (actually I am using >> namespaces like http://www.dcc.uchile.cl/~agraves/wordnet/1.0/schema) >> so it can be used by you, and maybe do some other minor modifications. >> >> I hope this can contribute in some way. Any questions, please drop me >> a line. >> >> Thanks for your time. >> AG >> >> PS: Any mistake in my english, I am sorry, it is not my native tongue >> :-) >> >> [1] http://www.dcc.uchile.cl/~agraves/wordnet/ >> > -- Cheers, AG ------------------------------------------------------ Alvaro Graves Fuenzalida - agraves [@] dcc.uchile.cl Computer Science Engineer - Universidad de Chile CS Master student - Universidad de Chile ------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2006 14:41:07 UTC