- From: David Wood <dwood@softwarememetics.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:11:20 -0400
- To: "Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)" <dbooth@hp.com>
- Cc: <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Hi David, Guus's comments: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jul/0004.html Libby Miller's comments: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Oct/0105.html John McClure commented, but I am not sure that these are his latest: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2006Jan/0016 Jeremy Carroll's comments: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Nov/0104 Does anyone have more complete information? Regards, Dave On 21 Aug2006, at 14:47, Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) wrote: > Who were the reviewers and what were their comments? > > David Booth, Ph.D. > HP Software > dbooth@hp.com > Phone: +1 617 629 8881 > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org >> [mailto:public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Wood >> Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2006 12:14 PM >> To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org >> Subject: Decision on publishing Time Ontology in OWL as a >> Working Draft >> Importance: High >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> The SWBP&D WG is winding down a bit later than planned. We would >> like to handle one last important issue before we officially close >> the WG: The WG needs to decide whether to publish the Time Ontology >> in OWL document [1] as a Working Draft. >> >> [1] >> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/Time-Ontology-20060518 >> >> Ralph has set up an online poll [2] so we can avoid another >> teleconference. PLEASE VOTE your preference so we can take a >> decision on this document. The poll will close at 23:59, >> Boston time >> on 2006-09-05. >> >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35495/pub0818/ >> >> Thank you all for your support. >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 24 August 2006 19:12:26 UTC