W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > April 2006

RE: [WNET] new proposal WN URIs and related issues

From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:50:52 -0400
Message-ID: <EBBD956B8A9002479B0C9CE9FE14A6C20B92D8@tayexc19.americas.cpqcorp.net>
To: "Mark van Assem" <mark@cs.vu.nl>, "SWBPD list" <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Cc: "Jan Wielemaker" <wielemak@science.uva.nl>, "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>, "Guus Schreiber" <guus@few.vu.nl>

> From: Mark van Assem
> . . .
>  Then we can put everything in one namespace. E.g. with URIs
> 
> - http://wordnet.princeton.edu/wn20/synset-bank-noun-1
> - http://wordnet.princeton.edu/wn20/wordsense-bank-noun-1
> - http://wordnet.princeton.edu/wn20/word-bank
> - http://wordnet.princeton.edu/wn20/schema-participleOf

I like this considerably better, because: (a) it is easier to maintain
one namespace than two, and (b) with one namespace, it is clearer that
they are all part of the same ontology.

Thanks also to Ralph and Jan for noticing the slash problem.

David Booth
Received on Tuesday, 18 April 2006 18:51:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:31:19 UTC