- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:50:52 -0400
- To: "Mark van Assem" <mark@cs.vu.nl>, "SWBPD list" <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: "Jan Wielemaker" <wielemak@science.uva.nl>, "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>, "Guus Schreiber" <guus@few.vu.nl>
> From: Mark van Assem > . . . > Then we can put everything in one namespace. E.g. with URIs > > - http://wordnet.princeton.edu/wn20/synset-bank-noun-1 > - http://wordnet.princeton.edu/wn20/wordsense-bank-noun-1 > - http://wordnet.princeton.edu/wn20/word-bank > - http://wordnet.princeton.edu/wn20/schema-participleOf I like this considerably better, because: (a) it is easier to maintain one namespace than two, and (b) with one namespace, it is clearer that they are all part of the same ontology. Thanks also to Ralph and Jan for noticing the slash problem. David Booth
Received on Tuesday, 18 April 2006 18:51:09 UTC