- From: Natasha Noy <noy@stanford.edu>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:47:36 -0700
- To: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
- Cc: swbp <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
On Sep 15, 2005, at 4:57 AM, Guus Schreiber wrote: > > > Natasha Noy wrote: > >> Guus, >> Thanks a lot again for your review. At the OEP teleconference >> today, we had a long discussion about the points you made in your >> review that were not addressed by the new draft published last >> week [1] >> The feeling of the task force is that it is ok to leave the note >> as it is. It really seem to be in the eye of the beholder what is >> a "real" n-ary relation and what is not. And there was a general >> agreement that RDF reification doesn't really address the issue >> brought out in the examples in the note. Thus, the treatment that >> the note already gives RDF reification (explaining that it >> addresses a different issue) seems sufficient. >> Would you be comfortable moving forward with the note in the state >> it is now? >> > > Natasha, > > In general OK. This weekend I will reply to the points you raised > in your response to my comments. I expect that will lead to some > smaller changes. Great -- thanks a lot. Natasha
Received on Friday, 16 September 2005 18:47:54 UTC