- From: Natasha Noy <noy@stanford.edu>
- Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 12:06:00 -0700
- To: swbp <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
There is a new draft of the n-ary relations note available at [1]. It addresses basically all of the comments that Ralph made in his review [2] (thanks a lot, Ralph, for the detailed comments!), except for this one: > Pattern 2: > 4th paragraph; suggest including links for OWL Full and OWL-DL; e.g. > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-features-20040210/#s1.3 > > Is there a simple reference to cite for why using rdf:List with > pattern 2 makes the result no longer OWL-DL? Does anyone know a good reference indeed? As for Guus's review [3], I've made the changes for things I indicated I will change right away in my reply [4]. The rest of Guus's comments require some answers from him to my reply. There was also some agreement that we should put in a paragraph on the fact that the use of n-ary relations avoids combinatorial explosion made in [5] (see the thread that followed). I initially agreed, but when I started putting it in, I was no longer sure it was worth it: is the point maybe obscure enough that putting a simple paragraph would not explain the issue, and giving it proper treatment would be too much for this note? What do others think? What would be a good simple paragraph to put in? Natasha [1] http://smi-web.stanford.edu/people/noy/nAryRelations/n- aryRelations-2nd-WD.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Aug/0000.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Aug/0009.html [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Aug/0023.html [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Jul/0017.html
Received on Thursday, 8 September 2005 19:06:18 UTC