W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > September 2005

Re: [SE] Guidance on late return of review comments

From: Benjamin Nguyen <Benjamin.Nguyen@inria.fr>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 03:28:03 +0200 (CEST)
To: Jeff Pan <Jeff.Pan@manchester.ac.uk>
cc: Benjamin Nguyen <Benjamin.Nguyen@inria.fr>, SWBPD <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>, Phil Tetlow <philip.tetlow@uk.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0509050318220.1555-100000@login-linux.inria.fr>

On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, Jeff Pan wrote:

> Hi Benjamin,
> 
> Thanks very much for your review. We have been revising the draft according to your comments. Meanwhile, we wonder if you could clarify the following comment:
> 
> [I1 : Add more cross references from inside the main document to the bibliography, mainly grouping together articles on similar topics. As is, I find it to difficult to use with a simple alpha ordering. Maybe add some sort of bibliographical review as a section 2.4 / OR add references links into sections 2.2 and 2.3]
> 
> Are you suggesting us to have more references in Sections 2.2 and 2.3?

Basically, this was regarding the end of section 2.3 which simply states : 
"related work is in appendix". I feel it is important in section 2.2 or 
2.3 to group together relevant work and explain which articles are on the 
same topic, and reference these articles directly from the text in 2.2 / 
2.3. I find simply the bibliography to be a little indigest, and much 
prefer links inside the text to each reference, or at least to the leading 
reference for each paragraph. As is, a lot of the work in appendix is not 
referenced from the text, so it is difficult to understant if some papers 
are 'milestones' and other are very specific. I think at least the 
articles deemed 'very important' should be highlighted: I don't think any 
articlesfrom appendix A are cited inside the document, (articles from 
section 7 were all referenced, however). Basivally I wondered  if 
this was normal i.e., all articles in appendix A are 'of lesser 
importance'. If this is the case -- fine. If not, then I figure highlight 
the important ones with a short comment + citation inside the document.

Hope this makes things clearer.

Regards,

BN

 > 
> Kind regards,
> Jeff
> 
> --
> Dr. Jeff Z. Pan  ( http://DL-Web.man.ac.uk/ )
> School of Computer Science, The University of Manchester
> 
> 
> 

-- 
------------------------------------
| Dr. BENJAMIN NGUYEN              |
| Université de Versailles         |
| et St-Quentin-en-Yvelines        |
| Eq. Systèmes de Bases de Données |
| 45, av des Etats-Unis            |
| 78035 Versailles CEDEX           |
|----------------------------------|
| INRIA-Futurs                     |
| Projet Gemo                      |
| 4, rue Jacques Monod             |
| ZAC des Vignes                   |
| 91893 Orsay CEDEX                |
| FRANCE                           |
------------------------------------

Tel. INRIA : (33) (0) 1 72 92 59 31
Tel. UVSQ  : (33) (0) 1 39 25 40 49
Received on Monday, 5 September 2005 01:28:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:31:12 UTC