- From: John McClure <jmcclure@hypergrove.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:39:28 -0700
- To: "Ben Adida" <ben@mit.edu>, "SWBPD list" <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-rdf-in-xhtml task force" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Hello, Nice documents! It would be very useful to see RDF/A discuss n-ary statement translation, as well as statements with anonymous predicates. The n-ary examples would be particulary helpful as I design Legal XHTML's ontogies which fully use n-ary expressions since UNCEFACT naming conventions are being followed. The crux of the Legal XHTML design is that a small set of predicate verbs (like <has>, <had>, <isA>, <wasA>, and others) are defined, and all objects are then named, e.g. DocumentLicense. In my view the most efficient coding, using an example from your document, would then be: This document is available under a <a rel='has:DocumentLicense' href='...'/>license</a>. where xmlns:has='http://www.legalxhtml.org/schema.owl#has', that is, the dereferenced namespace yields an rdf:Property object (whose ontology, conventionally, is the same as that for DocumentLicense). As for anonymous predicates, my approach is intutively consistent, in that it would be This document is available under a <a rel='DocumentLicense' href='...'/>license</a>. Finally, it would be reassuring to hear that the RDF/A attributes are being defined as QNAMES, not merely QNAME. That way there is less vocabulary lock-in, eg: This document is available under a <a rel='cc:license has:DocumentLicense' href='...'/>license</a>. Thanks much, John McClure PS Incidentally, the example above is easily adjusted to identify a PREVIOUS license associated with the document. This document was once available under a <a rel='had:DocumentLicense' href='...'/>license</a>. This document will soon be available under a <a rel='willHave:DocumentLicense' href='...'/>license</a>. Unfortunately the expressiveness of <cc:license> does NOT provide any information relating to the temporal nature of the relationship between subject and object -- this is what the <has>, <had>, and other predicate verbs specifically provide. >-----Original Message----- >From: public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org >[mailto:public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Ben Adida >Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 6:25 AM >To: SWBPD list >Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml task force >Subject: documents from RDF-in-HTML Task Force > > > > >Hello all, > >Here are three documents produced by the RDF-in-HTML Task Force for >review during the F2F. If you have any questions or comments prior to >the F2F, feel free to send them along to the task force mailing list >(public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org). > > >RDF/A Primer - A quick overview of RDF/A >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/2005-rdfa-primer > >RDF/A Syntax - A detailed specification of the RDF/A Syntax >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/2005-rdfa-syntax > >CURIEs - A note on compact URIs used in RDF/A >http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/HTML/2005-10-27-CURIE > > >We look forward to feedback from the working group on these issues! > >-Ben >
Received on Friday, 28 October 2005 19:37:30 UTC