- From: Giorgos Stamou <gstam@softlab.ntua.gr>
- Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 22:16:39 +0300
- To: <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: "'John R Smith'" <jsmith@us.ibm.com>, "'Jane Hunter'" <jane@dstc.edu.au>, <raphael.troncy@isti.cnr.it>, "'Christian Halaschek-Wiener'" <halasche@cs.umd.edu>
- Message-Id: <200510171917.j9HJHmje009933@kane.otenet.gr>
Dear all Here is the description of the media production usecase slightly changed. Now, I think it is more clear. In my opinion this usecase is very important and clearly shows off the need for semantic multimedia annotation. There are several archives providing, through the web, the information needed in the media production line. Moreover, media production houses have lately started to digitize and electronically archive their content and very soon it is expected that they will also provide their content through the web for external use. I would like to mention that we have personal experience since our laboratory have constructed multimedia databases for media production companies in Greece and web-based applications for retrieval). The photos I send to Nikos in order to use it for the benchmarking process, have been taken from one of these companies (under their permission). ****** A media production house requires several web services in order to organize and implement its projects. Usually, the pre-production and production start from location, people, image and footage search and retrieval in order to speed up the process and reduce as much as possible the cost of the production. For that reason some production houses maintain multimedia databases containing this information. Moreover, image and video banks, location management databases, casting houses etc provide services selling the above information through the web. The producers, location managers, casting managers and other people from the media company involved in the production process, are looking in the above archives in order to find the appropriate resources for their project. In general, the databases contain images from the locations, models, footage etc with metadata (administrative, structural, descriptive etc) providing information like the age of the model, the lighting condition of the location etc, used in the searching process. The quality of this search and retrieval process directly affects the quality of the service that the archives provide to the users. In order to facilitate the above process, the annotation of the image content should make use of the Semantic Web technologies, also following the multimedia standards in order to be interoperable with other archives. Using for example the tools described below, people that archives the content in the media production chain can provide all the necessary information (administrative, structural and descriptive metadata) in a standard form (RDF, OWL) that will be easily accessible for other people over the web. Using the Semantic Web standards, the archiving, search and retrieval processes will then make use of semantic vocabularies (ontologies) describing information concerning the structure of the content from thematic categories to description of the main objects appearing in the content with its main visual characteristics etc. In this way, multimedia archives will make their content easily accessible over the web, providing a unified framework for media production resource allocation. ******* Greetings Giorgos
Received on Monday, 17 October 2005 19:18:57 UTC