[Fwd: ok if URIs for SPARQL interface etc. ends with paren? (serviceDescription)] from Dan Connolly on 2005-10-06 (public-swbp-wg@w3.org from October 2005)

Forwarded message 1

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 15:46:06 -0500
Subject: ok if URIs for SPARQL interface etc. ends with paren? (serviceDescription)
To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1128631566.28805.398.camel@dirk>
X-Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/1128631566.28805.398.camel@dirk

According to latest word from the WSDL WG, the (standard) URI for our
interface will be...
http://www.w3.org/2005/08/sparql-protocol-query/#wsdl.interface(SparqlQuery)

i.e. something that can't be used as a qname in RDF/XML nor turtle.

Is that good enough? I need to say within the next week or so if not.


I can't think if any show-stopper reason why not, though it sure isn't pretty.

For details, the thread starts with
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005Sep/0009
and culminates with
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005Oct/0013


This is mostly related to serviceDescription, which we've
postponed.
 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#serviceDescription

But by the time we (or somebody like us) pick it up, it'll
be too late to give technical input on WSDL 2.0.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E