W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > October 2005

Review of EARL requirements

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 16:42:22 +0100
Message-ID: <4341515E.8050103@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: SWBPD <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>

This is a review of



     EARL 1.0 will provide mechanisms to relate test results with the 
specific location within the subject that triggered the result where 
   I suggest that requirement F02 should be demoted from "will" to 
"should". This is a complex requirement that would be good to meet, 
however I do not believe that EARL would have failed if this requirement 
cannot be met, so the lower status of "should" is appropriate.

   I suggest that
     EARL 1.0 may support backward compatibility of the language with 
previous versions published in earlier Working Drafts.
   be listed as a non-requirement, or not listed at all, since the 
rather particularly definition of may, seems to mean non-requirement.

[I assume further prettification comments are not interesting for this 

Received on Monday, 3 October 2005 15:42:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:31:13 UTC