- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2005 15:24:50 +0100
- To: SWBPD <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Here are some thoughts, other people's input desired.
1) The TF should aim to finish by the end of the WG lifetime (this charter)
2) Finishing involves:
- publishing 2nd draft, that
a) addresses all comments
(also checks against XSCD for updates in their latest draft)
b) makes decisions about best practice
c) asks for implementations
- publishing note, pointing to implementation experience (if any)
This suggests a F2F goal of publishing 2nd draft shortly after F2F.
On the decisions front ...
IIRC we have had no negative comments concerning the editors'
position versus identifiers, hence I think we should endorse the
editors' position.
OTOH, we have had disagreement from the HP Jena team concerning the
implementation difficulty with the editors' position with respect to
equality.
Thus:
critical path is probably something like:
- have discussion about response to HP Jena team
- make equality decision
- get draft ready
- review draft
It is not clear if all of this can be done in time for F2F so that we
can vote on 2nd WD at F2F.
Jeremy
Received on Monday, 3 October 2005 14:27:29 UTC