- From: Christopher Welty <welty@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 13:41:20 -0400
- To: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>
- Cc: ewallace@cme.nist.gov, public-swbp-wg@w3.org, public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org
I agree with Evan that it woudl be useful to pin this down. I don't think another month is going to get much more participation in the vote. Let's go with Galway. Several of us have pre-ISWC workshops in which TF related issues will be discussed, and it woudl be nice to be able to report on these at the f2f. Thus I think it would make sense to have the f2f *after* ISWC. -Chris Dr. Christopher A. Welty, Knowledge Structures Group IBM Watson Research Center, 19 Skyline Dr., Hawthorne, NY 10532 USA Voice: +1 914.784.7055, IBM T/L: 863.7055, Fax: +1 914.784.7455 Email: welty@watson.ibm.com, Web: http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty/ "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org> Sent by: public-swbp-wg-request@w3.org 05/10/2005 01:29 PM To ewallace@cme.nist.gov cc public-swbp-wg@w3.org Subject Re: Fall '05 face-to-face meeting planning At 12:59 PM 5/10/2005 -0400, ewallace@cme.nist.gov wrote: >There is a lot happening this fall and it would be helpful >to have the plans for the next ftf settled. I would indeed. It might help if people were to post known conflicts. The comments field of the location poll [1] is a great place to record your known conflicts. > I don't remember >this being mentioned at the last telecon. [[ Has everyone here submitted their data on straw poll on next f2f location? ]] -- http://www.w3.org/2005/05/05-swbp-minutes#item01 As of today there have been 19 respondents and 33 non-respondents to that poll. I have extended the questionnaire [1] by another month in hopes that some of the remaining 33 might respond. Of the 19 who have responded there is a very clear preponderance of support for Galway. At the Boston face-to-face [2], the Galway option was proposed so as to be concurrent with ISWC [3] (6-10 November). I read "concurrent with" as "immediately preceding or following", not "in parallel with". I suppose the poll could be augmented with an additional question "before?" (3-4 or 4-5 Nov) or "after?" (11-12, 12-13, 13-14, 15-16 Nov). [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35495/ftf2005/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/03/03-swbp-minutes#item10 [3] http://iswc2005.semanticweb.org/ -Ralph
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2005 17:41:39 UTC