- From: Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:18:46 +0100
- To: best-practice <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Alan Rector a écrit : > The first draft of a note on simple part-whole relations for defining classes is > at > http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~rector/swbp/simple-part-whole/simple-part-whole-relations-v0-2.html Hello Alan, Once again you have authored a very promising document. While reading it I wrote down a few comments, mainly details, see below. Best, Fabien [Section: Transitive relations - parts and direct parts] "(...) will draw the conclusions that the parts of C include both A and B." I understand what is meant here but (probably because I am not a native speaker) I find it ambiguous (when first reading it I understood it as "any part of C would include both A and B" which is wrong) and I would rather say something like "(...) will draw the conclusions that the set of the parts of C includes both A and B." " is_part_of_directly" I would prefer " is_direct_part_of" because it makes the reading of triples more natural: anA is_direct_part_of aB [Section: Choosing whether to use is_part_of or has_part] "To say that 'All As are parts of some B' does not imply that 'All Bs are part of some A'" Don't you mean that 'All As are parts of some B' does not imply that 'All Bs HAVE for part some A'" Wouldn't it be useful to introduce the inverse relation of is_part_of_directly / is_direct_part_of here ? (in fact I see it's done in one of the following sections) [Section: Use Cases] Wouldn't "geographical/spacial modelling" be a good use case too? [Section: Pattern 2: Defining classes for Parts] Font typos for " Part_of_car_directly subsumes" and "and that Part_of_car subsumes" [General] The <TITLE> of your draft is still "Defining N-ary Relations (…)" -- "Even one is not able to successfully translate one's own thoughts into words" -- Friedrich Nietzsche. ____________ |__ _ |_ http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/personnel/Fabien.Gandon/ | (_||_) INRIA Sophia Antipolis - ph# (33)(0)4 92 38 77 88
Received on Thursday, 27 January 2005 13:19:22 UTC