Re: [XSCH, ALL] some detailed comments from datatype note review

> 
> OWL does not support user-defined datatypes, which is the motivation of Section 2. A solution to extend OWL DL to support user-defined datatypes should cover

I am currently revising my OWL Syntax Checker, and the OWL Syntax rules 
do support user-defined datatypes ... I'm not totally convinced that OWL 
DL does not support user-defined datatypes - although it obviously 
wasn't explored in detail, since we hit a procedural road block early on.

> 
> 1) a standard way of referring to an XML Schema user defined simple
> type with a URI reference, and
> 
> 2) a formal framework of combining SHOIN with user defined datatypes so that the combined language is still decidable.
> 
> We will further revise Section 2 to cover the 2) point.

Jeremy

Received on Tuesday, 18 January 2005 11:31:30 UTC