- From: Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:32:51 -0500
- To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
The Data Access Working Group has asked me to ask participants in SWBPD to comment on two of their open issues. The DAWG chair is concerned that these issues are currently causing their schedule to slip and asks for opinions on whether these issues need to be resolved in a version 1 SPARQL specification. Both of these open SPARQL issues are related to data provenance. Specifically, if any of you have user feedback or design experience to comment on the short-term need for and whether you believe the community has suffcient design experience to believe that DAWG should attempt to settle the following two issues, please send your thoughts to public-rdf-dawg@w3.org or to public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#SOURCE SOURCE Allowing query expressions to refer to the source of a triple. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#unsaid NOT is not a good choice for "absent from graph": "UNSAID", unasserted, log:notIncludes
Received on Thursday, 13 January 2005 15:33:29 UTC