RE: [WN] Fwd: WordNet Namespace

Hi Peter, all,

> excluding them altogether could hurt. So what I have in mind now is to
> extend Mark's proposal by having three files:

Exactly what I meant :-), but with (3) split over one file per relation and a
file for wn:Words and wn:Wordsenses. Your 1+2 is what I named WN-Light. Most
Light-users will probably also load the hyponyms file, but that's still up to them.
 
> 1. one with synsets
> 2. one with labels for synsets
> 3. one that defines wordsenses, their relations to each other and their
> relations to synsets

<snip>

> Two alternatives may be:
> 
> 1. All statements with this resource as subject, predicate or object.
> 2. The concise bounded description of the resource [1]

These are options only for the slash-case, right?

Cheers,
Mark.