W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-swbp-wg@w3.org > December 2005

[WN] Fwd: WordNet Namespace

From: Aldo Gangemi <aldo.gangemi@istc.cnr.it>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:52:02 +0100
Message-Id: <p06210213bfc38cb14d1a@[62.11.1.90]>
To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Cc: schreiber@cs.vu.nl, mark@cs.vu.nl, jjc@hpl.hp.com, Benjamin.Nguyen@inria.fr, Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl

Dear all, after some delay, we have a proposal from Princeton for the 
wordnet semantic web version namespace. See below forwarded message 
from Ben Haskell.

My proposal is to use http://wordnet.princeton.edu/rdf, since this is 
short and non-ambiguous, since it can be specialized for owl and rdfs 
versions. Alternatively, we may have two disjoint namespaces for rdfs 
and owl.

Any comment on that?
Best
Aldo

>Delivered-To: aldo.gangemi@istc.cnr.it
>Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:51:12 -0500 (EST)
>From: Christiane Fellbaum <fellbaum@clarity.princeton.edu>
>To: aldo.gangemi@istc.cnr.it
>Subject: WordNet Namespace
>
>Ciao Aldo,
>
>This is the mail that I thought Ben had sent. My apologies--he sent
>it only to me.
>
>Regards
>
>Christiane
>
>======
>As far as I know, all it would entail would be us hosting some files, which is
>fine by me.
>
>Their example files seem to use:
>http://wordnet.princeton.edu/wn
>
>I would prefer:
>http://wordnet.princeton.edu/rdf
>or:
>http://wordnet.princeton.edu/rdf/wn
>or something similar (/owl or /w3c).
>
>At some point, we may use their example URL for our own purposes, and it
>won't be for RDF.
>-- Ben
>========


-- 



Aldo Gangemi
Research Scientist
Laboratory for Applied Ontology
Institute for Cognitive Sciences and Technology
National Research Council (ISTC-CNR)
Via Nomentana 56, 00161, Roma, Italy
Tel: +390644161535
Fax: +390644161513
aldo.gangemi@istc.cnr.it
http://www.istc.cnr.it/createhtml.php?nbr=71
Received on Monday, 12 December 2005 20:52:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:31:15 UTC