- From: Aldo Gangemi <aldo.gangemi@istc.cnr.it>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:52:02 +0100
- To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
- Cc: schreiber@cs.vu.nl, mark@cs.vu.nl, jjc@hpl.hp.com, Benjamin.Nguyen@inria.fr, Jacco.van.Ossenbruggen@cwi.nl
Dear all, after some delay, we have a proposal from Princeton for the wordnet semantic web version namespace. See below forwarded message from Ben Haskell. My proposal is to use http://wordnet.princeton.edu/rdf, since this is short and non-ambiguous, since it can be specialized for owl and rdfs versions. Alternatively, we may have two disjoint namespaces for rdfs and owl. Any comment on that? Best Aldo >Delivered-To: aldo.gangemi@istc.cnr.it >Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:51:12 -0500 (EST) >From: Christiane Fellbaum <fellbaum@clarity.princeton.edu> >To: aldo.gangemi@istc.cnr.it >Subject: WordNet Namespace > >Ciao Aldo, > >This is the mail that I thought Ben had sent. My apologies--he sent >it only to me. > >Regards > >Christiane > >====== >As far as I know, all it would entail would be us hosting some files, which is >fine by me. > >Their example files seem to use: >http://wordnet.princeton.edu/wn > >I would prefer: >http://wordnet.princeton.edu/rdf >or: >http://wordnet.princeton.edu/rdf/wn >or something similar (/owl or /w3c). > >At some point, we may use their example URL for our own purposes, and it >won't be for RDF. >-- Ben >======== -- Aldo Gangemi Research Scientist Laboratory for Applied Ontology Institute for Cognitive Sciences and Technology National Research Council (ISTC-CNR) Via Nomentana 56, 00161, Roma, Italy Tel: +390644161535 Fax: +390644161513 aldo.gangemi@istc.cnr.it http://www.istc.cnr.it/createhtml.php?nbr=71
Received on Monday, 12 December 2005 20:52:14 UTC