- From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 17:32:24 +0200
- To: Christopher Welty <welty@us.ibm.com>, Alan Rector <rector@cs.man.ac.uk>
- CC: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Christopher Welty wrote:
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/SimplePartWhole/
>
> Is ready for review. Guus and Bill had volunteered to review it.
I see Bill and Natasha have already sent extensive reviews :-).
I just started mine and for the moment have one thing to add to the list
of comments:
At the end of Pattern 2 the document says:
[[
If all are defined in this way we get a hierarchy from the classifier:
CarPart
Motor
MotorPart
Headlight
HeadlightPart
Headlight_bulb
...
]]
This seems the type of mixed (subclass, part-of) hierarchy that you
argue against in the next section: motors are car parts, but headlights
are no motors. How can one get this hierarchy from the classifier?
Guus
>
> -CHris
>
> Dr. Christopher A. Welty, Knowledge Structures Group
> IBM Watson Research Center, 19 Skyline Dr., Hawthorne, NY 10532 USA
>
> Voice: +1 914.784.7055, IBM T/L: 863.7055, Fax: +1 914.784.7455
> Email: welty@watson.ibm.com, Web:
> http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty/
--
Free University Amsterdam, Computer Science
De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 598 7739/7718; E-mail: schreiber@cs.vu.nl
Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2005 15:32:54 UTC