- From: Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:18:48 +0100
- To: "SWBPD list" <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Now that the RDF/Topic Maps Interoperability Task Force has been officially approved by the WG, I would like to get down to real work as soon as possible. I request that signed-up members of the TF, the co-chairs, and the team contact in particular read this message carefully and provide feedback on the ideas presented. As far as this message is concerned, silence will in general be interpreted as consent... Work methods ------------ Based on what I believe to be existing "best practice" in the SWBPD WG, I envisage the following work methods for the TF: 1. Regular discussions on this SWBPD mailing list using the magic string [RDFTM] in the Subject: line. 2. Occasional meetings by IRC using the SWBPD channel on an as-needed basis. 3. Collaborative wiki-based work using on the development of deliverables under the guidance of appointed editors. The University of Bologna (hereafter and forever more "UniBo") has a wiki up and running, but I'm not sure whether it is available to be used by the whole TF. I think the requirements would be for all members of the TF to have write access and for the pages themselves to be open for the whole world to view. Fabio: Please comment on whether UniBo could fulfill those requirements. Ralph: Please comment on whether such an arrangement would be acceptable from the W3C's point of view. David: Please comment on whether such an arrangement would be acceptable from the chairs' point of view. First deliverable ----------------- The first deliverable of the TF is a "Note describing the pros and cons of existing approaches [to RDF/TM Interoperability]". I would like to ask for volunteers to edit this document. Preparatory work in which the whole TF can participate includes the following: 1. Compiling a complete list of references to "existing approaches". 2. Agreeing a set of criteria by which to evaluate those approaches. 3. Compiling a set of test cases for use in the evaluation. Re. #1: I have compiled an initial list, to be posted on the wiki as soon as it is up and running (assuming that is the TF's preferred method of working). Others can then supplement it as necessary. Re. #2: I would like to invite suggestions for evaluation criteria to be sent to this mailing list under the subject "[RDFTM] Evaluation criteria". Re. #3: I have started creating TM test cases and will post them on the wiki once it is available. I would like to ask for volunteers to provide similar test cases for RDF. I will start a thread on this under the subject "[RDFTM] Test cases". I await answers to specific questions from Fabio, Ralph, and David as soon as possible, and input from other TF members thereafter. Regards, Steve -- Steve Pepper <pepper@ontopia.net> Chief Strategy Officer, Ontopia Convenor, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 Editor, XTM (XML Topic Maps 1.0)
Received on Wednesday, 24 November 2004 10:19:48 UTC