- From: Natasha Noy <noy@SMI.Stanford.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:41:28 -0700
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: SWBPD <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
> > Reminder: in my judgment none of these need be addressed before first > WD so, I'll do the trivial ones now and leave the rest on the todo list :) > 2) > > The N3 > > @prefix : <> > > uses the retrieval URL as the binding for : > > Thus > > :diagnosis_probability > > expands to the URI > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/n-aryRelations-20040623/ > diagnosis.n3#diagnosis_probability > > and when the file is moved to TR space will have two different > readings depending on whether it is read through the latest version > link or the this version link :( > > I suggest that a URL should be decided upon for this namespace (in > fact, I have already suggested the use of two URLs, one for the T-Box > and one for the A-Box) and that URL should be used explicitly in the > prefix declaration > > e.g. > > @prefix : <http://www.w3.org/example#> . This will not automatically solve the 404 problem though. I tend to agree with Ralph that the latter is more serious than whether or not to use the Protege namespace (I put it there out of habit/convenience). Ralph, if we use the w3 namespace, will we have a way to put the examples there so that we don't get 404s? It would be no problem to put the examples on the protege server so that the current version doesn't return errors (I was just lazy and haven't thought of this). I don't care which way it is done, so looking for guidance here. > > 5) > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/n-aryRelations-20040623/ > purchase.owl > > contains > > > xmlns:p1="http://" > > which is ugly and unnecessary. I think it is borderline legal by > XMLNS, but it is certainly not a good practice. Suggest delete it. fixed. Natasha
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2004 07:49:02 UTC