- From: Natasha Noy <noy@SMI.Stanford.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 18:49:04 -0700
- To: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>
- Cc: SWBPD <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
>> Further examples of URIs I don't like are in the example files where >> URIs starting http://protege.stanford.edu/ could be seen as endorsing >> protege rather than other tools. I think a w3.org URI would be more >> appropriate, in WG space, for these WG examples. > > The example files should actually work, so it is more important > here that the URIs not return 404. I agree. See my question in reply to Jeremy. >> RDF reification: I think the sentence referring the interested reader >> to the discussion of reification in RDF could be deleted. > > I disagree. The topics are related. A future version of the document > might want to say a bit more about the differences. I am hoping that someone who knows more about reification in RDF than I do could write up that part :) > Typos: All fixed -- thanks a lot for the careful read! Natasha
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2004 07:48:47 UTC